Why it is so important to become aware of our duty to continue evolution as best we can?

Quote from the book "I, You, and All of Us" (p. 141)

But for the Cosmic Hierarchy of the Solar System, the Earth has always been just a small "Blue Dot" in space. The cosmic merry-go-round continued to run unhindered. The Cosmic Clock was always punctual with its hours, which announced the corresponding transitions of the Earth through the variously dangerous zones of the Universe.

We already know the rest of the story from previous chapters. If we waited until 16.4 million years ago, for example, we witnessed the emergence of the first primates. And around the year 4720 B.C., we could see how the first representatives of our own Genus (and Species) had to be cared for and protected by the last Neanderthals, in order to survive in the world of the still immense cosmic catastrophe of stage 5 (which none of us can really imagine today), and to secure our own descendants. This is precisely why it is so important today to become aware of our duty to continue evolution as best we can. The unified vision of the inanimate and the living world around us, and within ourselves, can no longer be described and comprehended with Physics. For this, a new, Universal Philosophy is needed, a philosophy of life in a life-enabling (but not guaranteeing) Universe. It is precisely out of this sense of duty that this book was written. Even though it describes many ideas that are unknown to most of you, I hope that I can convey these novelties understandably enough. And if my wish comes true, you will even feel the enthusiasm for the wonderful simplicity and incredible beauty of the Universe in which we are privileged to live. I have felt it for years. That is why I know how valuable it is for our physical and mental health and strength.

Why you too can (and should) become a universal philosopher.

Quote from the book "I, You, and All of Us" (p. 152)

As you notice, I am giving a very different description of Nature here than you have certainly usually heard. But it is also only a description. Not an absolute truth. In what way, then, is this description better than all the others? The improvement lies in a single argument. But it is unbeatable. It is a Unified Description (the only one in the world so far), a Unified Science that unites all previous branches of the natural sciences and the humanities.

What does that mean in practical terms? All of today's science has different disciplines. In each of them we have different theories that try to explain to us (actually just tell us in more or less detail) how that part of the universe works that can be observed through the particular "glasses" of that particular discipline. In our description, the differences between the traditional disciplines no longer exist. There is only one "universal lens". There is only one idea of how the Universe works, and this idea is the same in all disciplines of science. The different disciplines are now starting to speak with the same language. In practical terms, this means above all that they use the same physical Time Scale of natural events. Everything that happens in Nature happens in a temporal order. And this sequence is the same when we talk about the evolution of the Universe (in cosmology), the Solar System (in astrophysics), the evolution of the Earth (in geophysics), the evolution of Humans (in biophysics), or the rise and fall of human civilisations (in history).

And what is even more exciting, this whole Time Scale arises from a Unified Family of all possible physical quantities, which in turn is based on only one natural premise, the size (or mass, if you like) of the primordial cosmic cloud from which our present Solar System arose. Isn't that enough of an appeal for you to embrace this whole new description of what we can and, I believe, should know? And to do so regardless of the resistance of all the traditionalists who want to keep the "status quo" in their ancestral disciplines? So, become a universal philosopher yourself. The joy of this will come as a side effect.

Quote from the book "I, You, and All of Us" (pp. 166-167)

We humans have always been rather egocentric, also in our world view. Ever since we realised (only around the middle of the 20th century) that our Sun (with its planetary system) could be a member of a (presumed) Milky Way galaxy, we have of course immediately arrogantly assumed - without really having any evidence to back it up - that this galaxy must be the largest and most beautiful of all. The truly beautiful Andromeda Galaxy, which is "only" about 2 million light years away from us (see the photo below), was only admitted as our sister galaxy.

Logically, the beauty of this sister was then quasi-officially transferred to our own galaxy. Out of the same arrogance, the Large Magellanic Cloud was not classified as a galaxy in its own right, but as what can be seen with the naked eye, a relatively small cosmic cloud that can only be seen in the southern sky. For a long time, most European astronomers were completely unaware of its existence. Fortunately, Nature herself helped us by causing a supernova to explode almost in the centre of this cloud in 1986. This gave us the unique opportunity to determine the exact distance to the Magellanic Cloud. This observed distance is almost identical to ours (theoretically reaching the centre of the cloud), a little over 164 thousand light years (compare level 5 of the table).

Our distance to the "Orion Cloud", traditionally perhaps the most observed birthplace for young stars, has been well known for decades. It is about 1100 light years, which is also (almost) identical to our theoretical distance to the centre of the Orion Complex (the stage 3). This means that any schoolchild could also calculate our distance to the centre of stage 4, which is still missing from this "traditional ladder". The gradation of each next step is always the same and is 12.1428 for the distances (see the comments on the table). So far, so good. But why has not only no schoolchild, but also no university professor used these commonly known numbers to calculate the missing distance of 13578.3 light years to the centre of the "hypothetical Milky Way"? Only one answer comes to mind. It didn't happen because, traditionally, this number must not exist. It does not fit our arrogant world view. Surely our own galaxy cannot be that small. With the "ridiculous" thirteen and a half thousand light years, it would be far too small to include all the visible stars we have declared as "our own". We'd rather have no theory than one that wants to count away our beautiful, huge galaxy.

Quotes from the book "I, You, and All of Us" (p. 166 and 218)

Despite the multiple obvious confirmations of the reality of the Cosmic Hierarchy, even these researchers and observers who have provided the figures of our table themselves find it difficult to accept the existence of our Cosmic Hierarchy. We must emphasise here that the Cosmic Hierarchy of our Solar System could actually already be introduced in traditional natural science and discussed without our Unified Physics. It is astonishing and sad at the same time that today whole generations of young people all over the world still leave their schools without learning a single word about this wonderfully ordered cosmic environment of the Earth. You, as readers of this book, should also feel obliged to improve this deplorable situation through education. It will probably be decades before schools are officially prepared to do this.

…

As we can see from our Cosmic Time Scale (in the previous appendix), since 1989 (and more precisely since 1 November 1989) we have all been living in the seventh civilisatory period of recent human history, in the First Global Civilisation. It will theoretically come to an end in the year 3108. So we are at the very beginning of our journey. We all have to learn to communicate globally, to live together, and to give a future to the further evolution of us humans, but also of all animals and the environment itself.

We have learned that the Solar System will be completely restructured in 78 million years at the latest. The life of Primates (the order to which we also belong), however, will already end in 8 million years. However, we cannot know today whether an act of self-extinction of humanity will take place sometime earlier (i.e. prematurely). We can only hope that when the new knowledge will open our eyes (and hearts) to the life of all living beings on Earth, we will still banish the deadly "mental" virus of individualism, of the "atomisation" of our world community, in time. And we can hope that our social defences will grow so strongly through the necessary amount of human "antibodies" that we will manage never to return to the logic of the Medieval Civilisation (which actually ended only 32 years ago) of violence, inhumanity, greed and fanaticism. That is what I wish for myself and all the people of the world.